The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised serious concerns over whether continuing with the UNESCO World Heritage Site status is affecting its long-term infrastructure expansion in Chandigarh.
During a recent hearing, a Bench led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu questioned whether retaining the heritage tag was worth the strict procedural and policy restrictions that come with it.
The court is currently examining issues related to the proposed expansion of the High Court building, which is part of Chandigarh’s Capitol Complex, a designated UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Court Raises Concerns Over Development Restrictions
Chief Justice Sheel Nagu openly asked whether the High Court should continue to hold on to the World Heritage status if it limits development.
He observed that the administration must evaluate whether the heritage tag is slowing down infrastructure growth. The court noted that any structural change within the complex requires compliance with UNESCO guidelines, including the preparation of a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA).
The Bench stressed that depending on international approval without having control over the process could create long-term uncertainty. It urged the administration to consider all practical aspects before moving forward.
Expansion Proposal Under UNESCO Framework
The High Court building, designed by renowned architect Le Corbusier, forms a key part of the Capitol Complex in Chandigarh. Because of its World Heritage recognition, any modification or expansion must undergo detailed review under the UNESCO framework.
The UT Administration informed the court that the concept note for the expansion project has already been submitted to the Fondation Le Corbusier.
Officials also stated that the proposal will be included in an International Management Plan, prepared jointly by seven member countries under a “transnational serial nomination.” After this process, the proposal will be placed before UNESCO for final approval, based on recommendations from ICOMOS, its technical advisory body.
Court Seeks ‘Plan B’ If UNESCO Rejects Proposal
The Bench asked the administration what steps would be taken if UNESCO does not approve the expansion proposal. When officials admitted there was no clear contingency plan, the court emphasized the need for a “Plan B.”
The court directed the UT Administration to provide full administrative and financial support for the preparation of the Heritage Impact Assessment and related reports. It ordered that these documents be submitted to the competent authority at the earliest.
The matter will next be heard on March 7. The court expects a clear timeline for submitting the HIA, calling it the most crucial document for UNESCO’s decision.
Infrastructure Shortage at High Court
The issue arises amid ongoing concerns about infrastructure shortages at the High Court. Although the sanctioned strength of judges stands at 85, only 69 courtrooms are currently functional.
The court has repeatedly highlighted that limited infrastructure affects judicial efficiency. Chief Justice Nagu earlier urged the administration to adopt a pragmatic approach and approve a comprehensive expansion plan to support the court’s functioning.
The case is being heard in response to public interest petitions filed against the Union of India and other respondents.
Growing Debate Over Heritage vs Development
This development has sparked a wider debate on balancing heritage conservation with institutional growth and public infrastructure needs. While the UNESCO World Heritage tag brings global recognition to Chandigarh, it also imposes strict compliance requirements.
As the legal proceedings continue, the final decision could significantly impact the future development of the High Court and the broader Capitol Complex area.
The outcome may also set an important precedent on how India balances heritage protection with modern infrastructure expansion.
